Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Goldshell AE-BOX runs 37.0 MH/s; the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs 360.0 GH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 180 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 614 BTU/hr |
| 89/100 | Home Mining Score | 89/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Based on BTC price of $64,947 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 500 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 972873% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 50% better power draw (360 vs 180 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 500 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 4% better weight (2.3 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% more heat output (1,228 vs 614 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $340 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.42 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$493 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$647 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$800 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,229.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 500 J/TH).