Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 GH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 180 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 614 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 500 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 818082% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 61% better power draw (460 vs 180 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 500 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 15% better weight (2.6 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 156% more heat output (1,570 vs 614 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 109% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $340 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$0.42 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$493 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$646 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$799 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-1.10/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 10,454,045.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 500 J/TH).