Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AE Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell AE Max |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 MH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 9,166,666.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell AE Max
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell AE Max trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell AE Max diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE Max 718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 86% better power draw (460 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell AE Max 12% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 9,166,667 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 81% better weight (2.6 vs 13.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 617% more heat output (1,570 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 38% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell AE Max |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $870 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$7.92 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$3,761 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$6,652 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$9,542 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max9,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AE Max: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell AE Max?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell AE Max?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell AE Max on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,287,878.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 9,166,667 J/TH).