Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AE Card
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell AE Card |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.5 MH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 11,818,181.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell AE Card
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell AE Card actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 86% better power draw (460.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 12% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 11,818,182 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 88% better weight (2.6 vs 0.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 608% more heat output (1,570 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 3% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell AE Card |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$0.16 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$156 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$213 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$270 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh10,454,545.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AE Card: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-1.10/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell AE Card better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell AE Card?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 69/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell AE Card: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,363,636.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 11,818,182 J/TH).