Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AE Max |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 MH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 9,166,666.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AE Max
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE-BOX et le Goldshell AE Max sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE Max diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE Max 873% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 89% better power draw (360 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell AE Max 6% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 9,166,667 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 83% better weight (2.3 vs 13.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 817% more heat output (1,228 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 38% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AE Max |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $870 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.92 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,761 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$6,652 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$9,542 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max9,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AE Max more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE Max on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 563,063.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 9,166,667 J/TH).