Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Goldshell AE-BOX is the stronger pick — it leads on 2 of 3 head-to-head factors. The Goldshell AE-BOX runs 37.0 MH/s; the Goldshell AE-BOX II runs 54.0 MH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AE-BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 54.0 MH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 530 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 9,814,814.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 3.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,808 BTU/hr |
| 89/100 | Home Mining Score | 89/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Based on BTC price of $65,094 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell AE-BOX edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 32% better power draw (360 vs 530 W) in the Goldshell AE-BOX's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE-BOX II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 46% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 32% better power draw (360 vs 530 W)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 1% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 9,814,815 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 22% better weight (2.3 vs 3.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 47% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,808 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AE-BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $120 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.27 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$584 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$1,049 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,513 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE-BOX9,729,729.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE-BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell AE-BOX II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE-BOX II: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE-BOX II on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH — a difference of 85,085.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 9,814,815 J/TH).