Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AE-BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 54.0 MH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 530 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 9,814,814.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 3.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,808 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell AE-BOX edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 32% better power draw (360 vs 530 W) in the Goldshell AE-BOX's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE-BOX II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 46% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 32% better power draw (360 vs 530 W)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 1% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 9,814,815 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 22% better weight (2.3 vs 3.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 47% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,808 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 6% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AE-BOX II |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $120 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.27 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$584 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$1,049 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,513 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE-BOX9,729,729.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE-BOX II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell AE-BOX II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE-BOX II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE-BOX II on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH — a difference of 85,085.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 9,814,815 J/TH).