Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AE Max II |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 540.0 MH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,925,925.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 85 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AE Max II
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE-BOX et le Goldshell AE Max II sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AE Max II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max II 1359% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 89% better power draw (360 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell AE Max II 39% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 5,925,926 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 59% better noise (35.0 vs 85.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 82% better weight (2.3 vs 12.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 789% more heat output (1,228 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 138% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AE Max II |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,050 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,853 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$6,656 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$9,460 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max II5,925,925.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell AE Max II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AE Max II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH — a difference of 3,803,803.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 5,925,926 J/TH).