Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 TH/s |
| 2,385 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 145% more hashrate (53.0 vs 130.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 145% more hashrate (53.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 27% better power draw (2,385 vs 3,250 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 44% better efficacité (45.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 36% more heat output (8,138 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$3.82 | Daily net profit | -$3.12 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 1 year | -$1,839 |
| -$3,061 | Net after 2 years | -$2,979 |
| -$4,454 | Net after 3 years | -$4,119 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-3.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (45.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).