Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs NerdNOS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | NerdNOS |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 12 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 24.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 41 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
NerdNOS
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the NerdNOS comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (2,520.0 vs 12.0 W). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and NerdNOS sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 11100% more hashrate (56.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- NerdNOS 100% better power draw (2,520.0 vs 12.0 W)
- NerdNOS 47% better efficacité (45.0 vs 24.0 J/TH)
- NerdNOS 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 0.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 20922% more heat output (8,598.2 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
- NerdNOS 218% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | NerdNOS |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $59 |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$1,885 | Net after 1 year | -$63 |
| -$3,357 | Net after 2 years | -$67 |
| -$4,829 | Net after 3 years | -$71 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdNOSScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdNOS24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the NerdNOS?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdNOS is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-4.03/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the NerdNOS better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdNOS is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the NerdNOS?
The NerdNOS scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and NerdNOS on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the NerdNOS runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 21.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (45.0 vs 24.0 J/TH).