Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Taux de hachage 1,200.0 GH/s Puissance 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
VS
NerdNOS

NerdNOS

Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s Puissance 12 W Efficiency 24.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Gamma vs NerdNOS

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Gamma Specification NerdNOS
1,200.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s
15 W Consommation électrique 12 W
12.5 J/TH Efficiency 24.0 J/TH
38 dB Niveau de bruit 30 dB
0.3 kg Weight 0.2 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 41 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000055 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit $0.01
Monthly $0.22
Yearly $2.63

NerdNOS

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.03
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.32
Yearly -$3.94

Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitaxe Gamma, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 140% more hashrate (1.2 vs 0.5 TH/s). That said, the NerdNOS isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitaxe Gamma and NerdNOS diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitaxe Gamma 140% more hashrate (1.2 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • NerdNOS 20% better power draw (15.0 vs 12.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 48% better efficacité (12.5 vs 24.0 J/TH)
  • NerdNOS 21% better noise (38.0 vs 30.0 dB)
  • NerdNOS 50% better weight (0.3 vs 0.2 kg)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 25% more heat output (51.2 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitaxe Gamma Metric NerdNOS
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $59
$0.01 Daily net profit -$0.01
-$96 Net after 1 year -$63
-$94 Net after 2 years -$67
-$91 Net after 3 years -$71
Takes ~37.7 years to pay back at current rates Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe Gamma

$0.02/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitaxe Gamma vs NerdNOS: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-0.01/day for the NerdNOS. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Gamma or NerdNOS?

The NerdNOS is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitaxe Gamma at 38 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe Gamma or the NerdNOS?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe Gamma and NerdNOS?

The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the NerdNOS runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 11.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (12.5 vs 24.0 J/TH).