Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 215.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,612 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,324 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 95% more hashrate (110 vs 215 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 95% more hashrate (110 vs 215 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 10% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,612 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 43% better efficacité (29.6 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 11% more heat output (11,089 vs 12,324 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.84 | Daily net profit | -$0.93 |
| -$1,762 | Net after 1 year | -$339 |
| -$3,163 | Net after 2 years | -$678 |
| -$4,565 | Net after 3 years | -$1,017 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215TScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is more profitable at $-0.93/day compared to $-3.84/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 12.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (29.6 vs 16.8 J/TH).