Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 110.0 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 13,200.0 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 73% more hashrate (63.5 vs 110.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)'s favour. That said, the Antminer K7 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 73% more hashrate (63.5 vs 110.0 TH/s)
- Antminer K7 5% better power draw (3,080 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 39% better efficacité (48.5 vs 29.6 J/TH)
- Antminer K7 100% better weight (14.0 vs 13,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 6% more heat output (10,509 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $360 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$3.84 |
| -$5,364 | Net after 1 year | -$1,763 |
| -$7,229 | Net after 2 years | -$3,165 |
| -$9,093 | Net after 3 years | -$4,568 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer K7 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer K7 or Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)?
The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer K7 or Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH — a difference of 19.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficacité (48.5 vs 29.6 J/TH).