Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16XP
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16XP |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,850 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,136 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Canaan Avalon A16XP
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon A16XP l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 173% more hashrate (110 vs 300 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan Avalon A16XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 173% more hashrate (110 vs 300 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 16% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,850 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 57% better efficacité (29.6 vs 12.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 18% more heat output (11,089 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16XP |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,280 |
| -$3.84 | Daily net profit | $1.55 |
| -$1,762 | Net after 1 year | -$3,713 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$3,145 |
| -$4,567 | Net after 3 years | -$2,578 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~7.5 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16XP$5.40/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A16XPScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A16XP12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.55/day compared to $-3.84/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Canaan Avalon A16XP?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan Avalon A16XP on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 16.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficacité (29.6 vs 12.8 J/TH).