Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 1,027 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 3,050.0 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,504 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 3400% more hashrate (140.0 vs 4.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 3400% more hashrate (140.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) 66% better power draw (3,010 vs 1,027 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 92% better efficacité (21.5 vs 256.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) 79% better weight (14,500 vs 3,050 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 193% more heat output (10,270 vs 3,504 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $522 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.19 | Daily net profit | -$2.32 |
| -$1,320 | Net after 1 year | -$847 |
| -$2,119 | Net after 2 years | -$1,694 |
| -$2,917 | Net after 3 years | -$2,541 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) is more profitable at $-2.19/day compared to $-2.32/day for the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) runs at 256.8 J/TH — a difference of 235.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficacité (21.5 vs 256.8 J/TH).