Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 512.0 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 7,424 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 25,331 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M73
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 266% more hashrate (140 vs 512 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 266% more hashrate (140 vs 512 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 59% better power draw (3,010 vs 7,424 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 33% better efficacité (21.5 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 100% better weight (14,500.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 147% more heat output (10,270 vs 25,331 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 |
|---|---|---|
| $522 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.19 | Daily net profit | $0.60 |
| -$1,320 | Net after 1 year | +$220 |
| -$2,119 | Net after 2 years | +$440 |
| -$2,917 | Net after 3 years | +$660 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M73$2.79/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M73Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7314.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is more profitable at $0.60/day compared to $-2.19/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M73?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 7.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (21.5 vs 14.5 J/TH).