Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

Taux de hachage 48.0 TH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 45.8 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Taux de hachage 512.0 TH/s Puissance 7,424 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M73
48.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 512.0 TH/s
2,200 W Consommation électrique 7,424 W
45.8 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
8,500.0 kg Weight 27.5 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 25,331 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithme SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

Daily Revenue 0.00002209 BTC $1.73
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$3.55
Monthly -$106.59
Yearly -$1,296.86

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Daily Revenue 0.00023561 BTC $18.42
Daily Electricity -$17.82
Daily Profit $0.60
Monthly $18.10
Yearly $220.24

Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 967% more hashrate (48.0 vs 512.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73's favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 967% more hashrate (48.0 vs 512.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer D1 70% better power draw (2,200 vs 7,424 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 68% better efficacité (45.8 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 27.5 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 237% more heat output (7,506 vs 25,331 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 15% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

$4.16/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is more profitable at $0.60/day compared to $-3.55/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer D1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M73?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73?

The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 runs at 45.8 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 31.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (45.8 vs 14.5 J/TH).