Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 96.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.5 TH/s |
| 2,832 W | Consommation électrique | 1,323 W |
| 29.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 9,663 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,514 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 611% more hashrate (96.0 vs 13.5 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 611% more hashrate (96.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 53% better power draw (2,832 vs 1,323 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 70% better efficacité (29.5 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 70% better weight (14,200 vs 4,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 114% more heat output (9,663 vs 4,514 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$3.34 | Daily net profit | -$2.69 |
| -$1,771 | Net after 1 year | -$1,047 |
| -$2,992 | Net after 2 years | -$2,029 |
| -$4,212 | Net after 3 years | -$3,010 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)29.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) or Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-3.34/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) or Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) runs at 29.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 68.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficacité (29.5 vs 98.0 J/TH).