Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.5 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 1,323 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,514 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,994 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer K7 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 370% more hashrate (63.5 vs 13.5 TH/s) in the Antminer K7's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer K7 370% more hashrate (63.5 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 57% better power draw (3,080 vs 1,323 W)
- Antminer K7 51% better efficacité (48.5 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Antminer K7 100% better weight (14.0 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer K7 133% more heat output (10,509 vs 4,514 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$2.69 |
| -$5,366 | Net after 1 year | -$1,047 |
| -$7,232 | Net after 2 years | -$2,029 |
| -$9,099 | Net after 3 years | -$3,011 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer K748.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer K7 or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 49.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficacité (48.5 vs 98.0 J/TH).