Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bolon Miner B11
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 70.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 47.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bolon Miner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Bolon Miner B11
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bolon Miner B11 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 438% more hashrate (13.0 vs 70.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Bolon Miner B11 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bolon Miner B11 438% more hashrate (13.0 vs 70.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 61% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,300 W)
- Bolon Miner B11 53% better efficacité (100.0 vs 47.1 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 63% better weight (4,200 vs 11,500 kg)
- Bolon Miner B11 154% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$5.40 |
| -$1,033 | Net after 1 year | -$1,972 |
| -$2,001 | Net after 2 years | -$3,943 |
| -$2,969 | Net after 3 years | -$5,915 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bolon Miner B1147.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bolon Miner B11: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-5.40/day for the Bolon Miner B11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or Bolon Miner B11?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bolon Miner B11: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Bolon Miner B11 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Bolon Miner B11 runs at 47.1 J/TH — a difference of 52.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (100.0 vs 47.1 J/TH).