Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Antminer T19
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | Antminer T19 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 84.0 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Consommation électrique | 3,150 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 37.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Antminer T19
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer T19 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 425% more hashrate (16.0 vs 84.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Antminer T19 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer T19 425% more hashrate (16.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 59% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,150 W)
- Antminer T19 53% better efficacité (80.0 vs 37.5 J/TH)
- Antminer T19 100% better weight (4,560.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- Antminer T19 146% more heat output (4,367 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T19 171% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Metric | Antminer T19 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$2.50 | Daily net profit | -$4.54 |
| -$911 | Net after 1 year | -$3,457 |
| -$1,823 | Net after 2 years | -$5,114 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 3 years | -$6,771 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T19Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T1937.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Antminer T19 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.50/day compared to $-4.54/day for the Antminer T19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Antminer T19?
The Antminer T19 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the Antminer T19?
The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Antminer T19: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 42.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (80.0 vs 37.5 J/TH).