Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,280 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 4,560.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,367 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 62% better efficacité (210.0 vs 80.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)'s favour. The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 62% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,280 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 62% better efficacité (210.0 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 4,560.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 162% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,367 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.50 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$911 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$1,822 |
| -$18,200 | Net after 3 years | -$2,734 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.50/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 130.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (210.0 vs 80.0 J/TH).