Antminer AL1 vs Antminer D9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer AL1 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Antminer AL1 runs 16.0 TH/s; the Antminer D9 runs 1,770.0 GH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Antminer D9 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,770.0 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,839 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,604.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 16.1 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,687 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Antminer D9
Based on BTC price of $64,888 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer AL1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 804% more hashrate (16.0 vs 1.8 TH/s). That said, the Antminer D9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Antminer D9 sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer AL1 804% more hashrate (16.0 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 16% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,839 W)
- Antminer AL1 87% better efficacité (210 vs 1,604 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 10% better weight (14.5 vs 16.1 kg)
- Antminer AL1 18% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,687 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Antminer D9 |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$7.54 | Daily net profit | -$6.76 |
| -$12,753 | Net after 1 year | -$5,466 |
| -$15,505 | Net after 2 years | -$7,932 |
| -$18,258 | Net after 3 years | -$10,398 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or Antminer D9 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer D9 is more profitable at $-6.76/day compared to $-7.54/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer D9: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer D9: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer D9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,394.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (210 vs 1,604 J/TH).