Antminer AL1 vs Antminer KS5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer KS5 is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Antminer AL1 runs 16.0 TH/s; the Antminer KS5 runs 20.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Antminer KS5 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 20.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,000 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 150.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 76 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 15.8 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Antminer KS5
Based on BTC price of $65,438 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer KS5, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 29% better efficacité (210 vs 150 J/TH). The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer AL1 and Antminer KS5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer KS5 25% more hashrate (16.0 vs 20.0 TH/s)
- Antminer KS5 11% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,000 W)
- Antminer KS5 29% better efficacité (210 vs 150 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 1% better noise (75.0 vs 76.0 dB)
- Antminer AL1 8% better weight (14.5 vs 15.8 kg)
- Antminer AL1 12% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Antminer KS5 |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$7.54 | Daily net profit | -$6.54 |
| -$12,751 | Net after 1 year | -$14,388 |
| -$15,502 | Net after 2 years | -$16,775 |
| -$18,253 | Net after 3 years | -$19,163 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer KS5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 is more profitable at $-6.54/day compared to $-7.54/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer KS5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Antminer KS5?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Antminer KS5 on J/TH?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficacité (210 vs 150 J/TH).