Antminer D9 vs Antminer KS5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer KS5 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Antminer D9 runs 1,770.0 GH/s; the Antminer KS5 runs 20.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Antminer KS5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 20.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 3,000 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 150.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 76 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 15.8 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Antminer KS5
Based on BTC price of $64,141 and current network difficulty as of Jun 13, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS5 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1030% more hashrate (1.8 vs 20.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer D9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Antminer KS5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS5 1030% more hashrate (1.8 vs 20.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 5% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,000 W)
- Antminer KS5 91% better efficacité (1,604 vs 150 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 1% better noise (75.0 vs 76.0 dB)
- Antminer KS5 2% better weight (16.1 vs 15.8 kg)
- Antminer KS5 6% more heat output (9,687 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Antminer KS5 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$6.76 | Daily net profit | -$6.62 |
| -$5,468 | Net after 1 year | -$14,416 |
| -$7,936 | Net after 2 years | -$16,832 |
| -$10,405 | Net after 3 years | -$19,249 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer D9 or Antminer KS5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 is more profitable at $-6.62/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Antminer KS5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D9 or the Antminer KS5?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Antminer D9 and Antminer KS5 on J/TH?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,454.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficacité (1,604 vs 150 J/TH).