Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Consommation électrique | 1,432 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,886 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,071 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 41% better efficacité (80.0 vs 136.4 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 52% more hashrate (16.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 11% better power draw (1,280 vs 1,432 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 41% better efficacité (80.0 vs 136.4 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 8% better weight (4,560 vs 4,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 12% more heat output (4,367 vs 4,886 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$2.50 | Daily net profit | -$3.06 |
| -$911 | Net after 1 year | -$2,072 |
| -$1,823 | Net after 2 years | -$3,188 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 3 years | -$4,305 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.50/day compared to $-3.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th): which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH — a difference of 56.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficacité (80.0 vs 136.4 J/TH).