Antminer S9i vs Canaan Avalon A16XP
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S9i | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16XP |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 TH/s |
| 1,320 W | Consommation électrique | 3,850 W |
| 94.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.8 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 4,504 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,136 BTU/hr |
| 83/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S9i
Canaan Avalon A16XP
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon A16XP l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 2043% more hashrate (14.0 vs 300.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A16XP's favour. The Antminer S9i claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S9i and Canaan Avalon A16XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 2043% more hashrate (14.0 vs 300.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S9i 66% better power draw (1,320 vs 3,850 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 86% better efficacité (94.3 vs 12.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer S9i 72% better weight (4.2 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 192% more heat output (4,504 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S9i 177% more score de minage domestique (83.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S9i | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16XP |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,280 |
| -$2.66 | Daily net profit | $1.56 |
| -$972 | Net after 1 year | -$3,712 |
| -$1,945 | Net after 2 years | -$3,143 |
| -$2,917 | Net after 3 years | -$2,575 |
| — | Payback period | Takes ~7.5 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16XP$4.22/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S9iScore: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A16XP12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S9i or Canaan Avalon A16XP more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.56/day compared to $-2.66/day for the Antminer S9i. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S9i or the Canaan Avalon A16XP better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9i at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S9i vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S9i scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16XP). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S9i and Canaan Avalon A16XP?
The Antminer S9i runs at 94.3 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 81.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (94.3 vs 12.8 J/TH).