Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Taux de hachage 260.0 TH/s Puissance 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 50T

Innosilicon T3 50T

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AT2880 Specification Innosilicon T3 50T
260.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s
4,420 W Consommation électrique 3,100 W
17.0 J/TH Efficiency 62.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
Weight 10,000.0 kg
15,081 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,577 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00012216 BTC $8.09
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$2.52
Monthly -$75.48
Yearly -$918.33

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002349 BTC $1.56
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$5.88
Monthly -$176.52
Yearly -$2,147.60

Based on BTC price of $66,239 and current network difficulty as of Mar 28, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AT2880 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Le Innosilicon T3 50T a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AT2880 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T3 50T

Score: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T3 50T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-2.52/day compared to $-5.88/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 50T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Innosilicon T3 50T scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 45.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.