Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 68.0 TH/s |
| 8,046 W | Consommation électrique | 3,420 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.3 J/TH |
| 80 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 20.0 kg | Weight | 11,200.0 kg |
| 27,453 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 23/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 606% more hashrate (480.0 vs 68.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U and Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 606% more hashrate (480.0 vs 68.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 57% better power draw (8,046 vs 3,420 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 67% better efficacité (16.8 vs 50.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 100% better weight (20.0 vs 11,200.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 135% more heat output (27,453 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 5% more score de minage domestique (23.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $5,568 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $519 |
| -$2.04 | Daily net profit | -$5.76 |
| -$6,313 | Net after 1 year | -$2,622 |
| -$7,058 | Net after 2 years | -$4,725 |
| -$7,804 | Net after 3 years | -$6,828 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2UScore: 23/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U is more profitable at $-2.04/day compared to $-5.76/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U or Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U scores 23/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U and Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U runs at 16.8 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro runs at 50.3 J/TH — a difference of 33.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (16.8 vs 50.3 J/TH).