Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246

Taux de hachage 90.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E10D

Ebang Ebit E10D

Taux de hachage 25.0 TH/s Puissance 3,500 W Efficiency 140.0 J/TH

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 vs Ebang Ebit E10D

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 Specification Ebang Ebit E10D
90.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 25.0 TH/s
3,420 W Consommation électrique 3,500 W
38.0 J/TH Efficiency 140.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
12,800.0 kg Weight 12,000.0 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,942 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246

Daily Revenue 0.00004142 BTC $3.24
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$4.97
Monthly -$149.07
Yearly -$1,813.65

Ebang Ebit E10D

Daily Revenue 0.00001150 BTC $0.90
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$7.50
Monthly -$225.01
Yearly -$2,737.59

Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 73% better efficacité (38.0 vs 140.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 — l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 and Ebang Ebit E10D sit on each measurable spec:

  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 260% more hashrate (90.0 vs 25.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 2% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,500 W)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 73% better efficacité (38.0 vs 140.0 J/TH)
  • Ebang Ebit E10D 6% better weight (12,800 vs 12,000 kg)
  • Ebang Ebit E10D 2% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 Metric Ebang Ebit E10D
$241 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.97 Daily net profit -$7.50
-$2,055 Net after 1 year -$2,738
-$3,868 Net after 2 years -$5,475
-$5,682 Net after 3 years -$8,213
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan AvalonMiner 1246

38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 or the Ebang Ebit E10D?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 is more profitable at $-4.97/day compared to $-7.50/day for the Ebang Ebit E10D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 or Ebang Ebit E10D?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 or Ebang Ebit E10D?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 and Ebang Ebit E10D on J/TH?

The Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E10D runs at 140.0 J/TH — a difference of 102.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (38.0 vs 140.0 J/TH).