iPollo B1L vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 33.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 2,145 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 8,550.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,319 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo B1L comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 76% more hashrate (58.0 vs 33.0 TH/s) in the iPollo B1L's favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo B1L 76% more hashrate (58.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 29% better power draw (3,000 vs 2,145 W)
- iPollo B1L 20% better efficacité (51.7 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 33% better weight (12,700 vs 8,550 kg)
- iPollo B1L 40% more heat output (10,236 vs 7,319 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 18% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$3.96 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 1 year | -$3,945 |
| -$4,162 | Net after 2 years | -$5,391 |
| -$6,028 | Net after 3 years | -$6,836 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M10Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo B1L vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 is more profitable at $-3.96/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo B1L vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 13.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (51.7 vs 65.0 J/TH).