iPollo B1L vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 354.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 5,133 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 17,514 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 510% more hashrate (58.0 vs 354.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76's favour. The iPollo B1L holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo B1L and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 510% more hashrate (58.0 vs 354.0 TH/s)
- iPollo B1L 42% better power draw (3,000 vs 5,133 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 72% better efficacité (51.7 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 71% more heat output (10,236 vs 17,514 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | $0.42 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 1 year | +$155 |
| -$4,162 | Net after 2 years | +$310 |
| -$6,028 | Net after 3 years | +$464 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76$5.54/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7614.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo B1L or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 is more profitable at $0.42/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or MicroBT WhatsMiner M76?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo B1L or MicroBT WhatsMiner M76?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 37.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (51.7 vs 14.5 J/TH).