Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal BK-B

Baikal BK-B

Taux de hachage 160.0 GH/s Puissance 410 W Efficiency 2,562.5 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-N70

Baikal BK-N70

Taux de hachage 140.0 KH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH

Baikal BK-B vs Baikal BK-N70

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-B Specification Baikal BK-N70
160.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 140.0 KH/s
410 W Consommation électrique 240 W
2,562.5 J/TH Efficiency 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
3,800.0 kg Weight 4,000.0 kg
1,399 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithme Cryptonight
Baikal Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-B

Daily Revenue 0.00000007 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.98
Daily Profit -$0.98
Monthly -$29.35
Yearly -$357.06

Baikal BK-N70

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal BK-B comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 114285614% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal BK-N70 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Baikal BK-B — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-B and Baikal BK-N70 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-B 114285614% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-N70 41% better power draw (410 vs 240 W)
  • Baikal BK-B 100% better efficacité (2,563 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-B 5% better weight (3,800 vs 4,000 kg)
  • Baikal BK-B 71% more heat output (1,399 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-B 10% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Baikal BK-B Metric Baikal BK-N70
Upfront cost (MSRP) $597
-$0.98 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$357 Net after 1 year -$807
-$714 Net after 2 years -$1,017
-$1,071 Net after 3 years -$1,228
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-B

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-B

2,562.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Baikal BK-B or the Baikal BK-N70?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N70 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-0.98/day for the Baikal BK-B. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-B or Baikal BK-N70?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-B or the Baikal BK-N70?

The Baikal BK-B scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Baikal BK-N70). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-B and Baikal BK-N70?

The Baikal BK-B runs at 2,562.5 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N70 runs at 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,714,283,151.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (2,563 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH).