Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal BK-D

Baikal BK-D

Taux de hachage 320.0 GH/s Puissance 1,100 W Efficiency 3,437.5 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-N70

Baikal BK-N70

Taux de hachage 140.0 KH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH

Baikal BK-D vs Baikal BK-N70

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-D Specification Baikal BK-N70
320.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 140.0 KH/s
1,100 W Consommation électrique 240 W
3,437.5 J/TH Efficiency 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
6,500.0 kg Weight 4,000.0 kg
3,753 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithme Cryptonight
Baikal Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-D

Daily Revenue 0.00000015 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$2.64
Daily Profit -$2.63
Monthly -$78.85
Yearly -$959.40

Baikal BK-N70

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Baikal BK-D, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 228571329% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-N70 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Baikal BK-D — l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-D and Baikal BK-N70 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-D 228571329% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-N70 78% better power draw (1,100 vs 240 W)
  • Baikal BK-D 100% better efficacité (3,438 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-N70 38% better weight (6,500 vs 4,000 kg)
  • Baikal BK-D 358% more heat output (3,753 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Baikal BK-D Metric Baikal BK-N70
Upfront cost (MSRP) $597
-$2.63 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$959 Net after 1 year -$807
-$1,919 Net after 2 years -$1,017
-$2,878 Net after 3 years -$1,228
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-D

3,437.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-D or Baikal BK-N70 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N70 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.63/day for the Baikal BK-D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Baikal BK-D vs Baikal BK-N70: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-D or the Baikal BK-N70?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-D and Baikal BK-N70?

The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N70 runs at 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,714,282,276.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (3,438 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH).