Baikal BK-N240 vs PinIdea RR-200
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N240 | Specification | PinIdea RR-200 |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 55.0 KH/s |
| 650 W | Consommation électrique | 350 W |
| 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 6,363,636,363.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 5,000.0 kg |
| 2,218 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,194 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithme | Cryptonight |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | PinIdea |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N240
PinIdea RR-200
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Baikal BK-N240 et le PinIdea RR-200 sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Baikal BK-N240 and PinIdea RR-200 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Baikal BK-N240 773% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- PinIdea RR-200 46% better power draw (650 vs 350 W)
- Baikal BK-N240 79% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 6,363,636,364 J/TH)
- PinIdea RR-200 23% better weight (6,500 vs 5,000 kg)
- Baikal BK-N240 86% more heat output (2,218 vs 1,194 BTU/hr)
- PinIdea RR-200 13% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 34.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PinIdea RR-200Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-N2401,354,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Baikal BK-N240 vs PinIdea RR-200: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PinIdea RR-200 is more profitable at $-0.84/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Baikal BK-N240 vs PinIdea RR-200: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-N240 or PinIdea RR-200?
The PinIdea RR-200 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-N240 and PinIdea RR-200?
The Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH while the PinIdea RR-200 runs at 6,363,636,363.6 J/TH — a difference of 5,009,469,697.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 6,363,636,364 J/TH).