iBeLink BM-N3 vs Bitmain CK6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| — | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
Bitmain CK6-SE
Based on BTC price of $78,078 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-N3 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 32% better efficacité (132 vs 194 J/TH). The Bitmain CK6-SE holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N3 and Bitmain CK6-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 47% more hashrate (25.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N3 32% better efficacité (132 vs 194 J/TH)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 32% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.02 | Daily net profit | -$7.31 |
| -$3,543 | Net after 1 year | -$2,668 |
| -$6,106 | Net after 2 years | -$5,336 |
| -$8,669 | Net after 3 years | -$8,004 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain CK6-SEScore: 29/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or Bitmain CK6-SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N3 is more profitable at $-7.02/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or the Bitmain CK6-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain CK6-SE is quieter at 80 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N3 or the Bitmain CK6-SE?
The Bitmain CK6-SE scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs Bitmain CK6-SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 62.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (132 vs 194 J/TH).