Elphapex DG Home 1 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Elphapex DG Home 1 | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 205.0 MH/s |
| 620 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 310,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,073,170.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 58/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Elphapex | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Elphapex DG Home 1
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,167 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Elphapex DG Home 1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 876% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Elphapex DG Home 1 and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Elphapex DG Home 1 876% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 65% better power draw (620 vs 220 W)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 71% better efficacité (310,000 vs 1,073,171 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 30% better noise (50.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 80% better weight (10.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 182% more heat output (2,115 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 14% more score de minage domestique (58.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Elphapex DG Home 1 | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $510 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$1,053 | Net after 1 year | -$492 |
| -$1,596 | Net after 2 years | -$684 |
| -$2,140 | Net after 3 years | -$877 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE ProScore: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG Home 1310,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Elphapex DG Home 1 or Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Elphapex DG Home 1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Elphapex DG Home 1 or Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Elphapex DG Home 1 at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Elphapex DG Home 1 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 58/100 for the Elphapex DG Home 1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Elphapex DG Home 1 and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 runs at 310,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro runs at 1,073,170.7 J/TH — a difference of 763,170.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (310,000 vs 1,073,171 J/TH).