Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 205.0 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,073,170.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 220 W) in the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max 76% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 220 W)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 88% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,073,171 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 85% better weight (13.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 1400% more heat output (11,260 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 32% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$492 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$684 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$877 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE ProScore: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro1,073,170.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro runs at 1,073,170.7 J/TH — a difference of 8,093,495.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,073,171 J/TH).