Ebang Ebit E9.2 vs PiAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Ebang Ebit E9.2 | Specification | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,320 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 110.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 4,700.0 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 4,504 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Ebang | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Ebang Ebit E9.2
PiAxe
Based on BTC price of $78,215 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the PiAxe, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (1,320.0 vs 15.0 W) in the PiAxe's favour. The Ebang Ebit E9.2 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Ebang Ebit E9.2 and PiAxe sit on each measurable spec:
- Ebang Ebit E9.2 2300% more hashrate (12.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- PiAxe 99% better power draw (1,320.0 vs 15.0 W)
- PiAxe 73% better efficacité (110.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- PiAxe 100% better weight (4,700.0 vs 0.2 kg)
- Ebang Ebit E9.2 8696% more heat output (4,503.8 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 126% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Ebang Ebit E9.2 | Metric | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$999 | Net after 1 year | -$86 |
| -$1,997 | Net after 2 years | -$92 |
| -$2,996 | Net after 3 years | -$99 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
PiAxe30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Ebang Ebit E9.2 or the PiAxe?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Ebang Ebit E9.2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Ebang Ebit E9.2 or the PiAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9.2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Ebang Ebit E9.2 vs PiAxe: which fits a residential setup better?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9.2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Ebang Ebit E9.2 vs PiAxe: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Ebang Ebit E9.2 runs at 110.0 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 80.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (110.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).