Goldshell KA BOX vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KA BOX | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 339.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KA BOX
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS5L comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 917% more hashrate (1.2 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS5L's favour. The Goldshell KA BOX claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KA BOX and Iceriver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS5L 917% more hashrate (1.2 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 88% better power draw (400 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS5L 16% better efficacité (339 vs 283 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 83% better weight (2.6 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KS5L 750% more heat output (1,365 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell KA BOX | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $305 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$0.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$640 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$975 | Net after 2 years | -$6,041 |
| -$1,310 | Net after 3 years | -$8,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell KA BOX or the Iceriver KS5L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell KA BOX or the Iceriver KS5L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Iceriver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell KA BOX vs Iceriver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell KA BOX and Iceriver KS5L?
The Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 55.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (339 vs 283 J/TH).