Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KA BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 339 J/TH) in the Goldshell KA BOX's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KA BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KA BOX 2185085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 25% better power draw (530 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 12% better weight (3.0 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 33% more heat output (1,808 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 5% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KA BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KA BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KA BOX at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell KA BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Goldshell KA BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KA BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,475.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 339 J/TH).