Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner vs Dayun Zig D1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner | Specification | Dayun Zig D1 |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 48.0 GH/s |
| 192 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 320,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45,833.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,720.0 kg | Weight | 9,850.0 kg |
| 655 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Dayun |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner
Dayun Zig D1
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Dayun Zig D1 l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 7900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner and Dayun Zig D1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Dayun Zig D1 7900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 91% better power draw (192 vs 2,200 W)
- Dayun Zig D1 86% better efficacité (320,000 vs 45,833 J/TH)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 83% better weight (1,720 vs 9,850 kg)
- Dayun Zig D1 1046% more heat output (655 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 27% more score de minage domestique (33.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner | Metric | Dayun Zig D1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.46 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$1,168 | Net after 1 year | -$1,927 |
| -$1,336 | Net after 2 years | -$3,853 |
| -$1,505 | Net after 3 years | -$5,780 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Quadruple Mini MinerScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dayun Zig D145,833.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner vs Dayun Zig D1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner is more profitable at $-0.46/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Dayun Zig D1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner vs Dayun Zig D1: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner or the Dayun Zig D1?
The Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Dayun Zig D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner and Dayun Zig D1?
The Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner runs at 320,000.0 J/TH while the Dayun Zig D1 runs at 45,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 274,166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (320,000 vs 45,833 J/TH).