Obelisk SC1 Slim vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Obelisk SC1 Slim | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 550.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 TH/s |
| 450 W | Consommation électrique | 2,820 W |
| 818.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 1,535 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,622 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b | Algorithme | Blake2b |
| Obelisk | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Obelisk SC1 Slim
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1900% more hashrate (0.6 vs 11.0 TH/s). The Obelisk SC1 Slim holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Obelisk SC1 Slim and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 1900% more hashrate (0.6 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Obelisk SC1 Slim 84% better power draw (450 vs 2,820 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 69% better efficacité (818 vs 256 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 527% more heat output (1,535 vs 9,622 BTU/hr)
- Obelisk SC1 Slim 55% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Obelisk SC1 Slim | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$1.06 | Daily net profit | -$6.37 |
| -$2,987 | Net after 1 year | -$2,756 |
| -$3,374 | Net after 2 years | -$5,082 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 3 years | -$7,408 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Obelisk SC1 SlimScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)256.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Obelisk SC1 Slim or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Obelisk SC1 Slim is more profitable at $-1.06/day compared to $-6.37/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Obelisk SC1 Slim or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Obelisk SC1 Slim vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Obelisk SC1 Slim scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Obelisk SC1 Slim and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Obelisk SC1 Slim runs at 818.2 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) runs at 256.4 J/TH — a difference of 561.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (818 vs 256 J/TH).