Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,820 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.4 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,622 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 256 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 3055456% more hashrate (0.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 15% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,820 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 256 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 3% better weight (13.5 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 17% more heat output (11,260 vs 9,622 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$6.37 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,756 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$5,082 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$7,408 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)256.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) is more profitable at $-6.37/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) runs at 256.4 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,410.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 256 J/TH).