Obelisk SC1 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Obelisk SC1 | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 550.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 2,820 W |
| 909.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,000.0 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,622 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b | Algorithme | Blake2b |
| Obelisk | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Obelisk SC1
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 1900% more hashrate (0.6 vs 11.0 TH/s). That said, the Obelisk SC1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Obelisk SC1 and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 1900% more hashrate (0.6 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Obelisk SC1 82% better power draw (500 vs 2,820 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 72% better efficacité (909 vs 256 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 100% better weight (9,000.0 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 464% more heat output (1,706 vs 9,622 BTU/hr)
- Obelisk SC1 55% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Obelisk SC1 | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$1.18 | Daily net profit | -$6.37 |
| -$431 | Net after 1 year | -$2,756 |
| -$862 | Net after 2 years | -$5,082 |
| -$1,292 | Net after 3 years | -$7,407 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Obelisk SC1Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)256.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Obelisk SC1 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Obelisk SC1 is more profitable at $-1.18/day compared to $-6.37/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Obelisk SC1 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Obelisk SC1 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Obelisk SC1 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Obelisk SC1 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Obelisk SC1 runs at 909.1 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) runs at 256.4 J/TH — a difference of 652.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (909 vs 256 J/TH).