iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 GH/s |
| 220 W | Consommation électrique | 550 W |
| 785,714.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 751 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-QE, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 525% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-QE's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 and Jasminer X16-QE sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-QE 525% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 60% better power draw (220 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 60% better efficacité (785,714 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 79% better weight (2.1 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-QE 150% more heat output (751 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 2% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$0.53 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$893 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$1,085 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$1,278 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X16-QE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.32/day for the Jasminer X16-QE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or the Jasminer X16-QE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or the Jasminer X16-QE?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Jasminer X16-QE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X16-QE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 runs at 785,714.3 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 471,428.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficacité (785,714 vs 314,286 J/TH).