MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 3,520 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,010 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M50S++
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M50S++ l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 385% more hashrate (33.0 vs 160.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M50S++'s favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50S++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50S++ 385% more hashrate (33.0 vs 160.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 39% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,520 W)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 66% better efficacité (65.0 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 64% more heat output (7,319 vs 12,010 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 15% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | -$2.69 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | -$4,982 |
| -$5,391 | Net after 2 years | -$5,965 |
| -$6,837 | Net after 3 years | -$6,947 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S++Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S++22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M50S++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S++ is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S++: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M50S++ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50S++?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 43.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 66% better efficacité (65.0 vs 22.0 J/TH).