MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,520 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,010 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Whatsminer M50S++
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50S++, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 191% more hashrate (55.0 vs 160.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M50S++'s favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M50S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S++ 191% more hashrate (55.0 vs 160.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 1% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,520 W)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 65% better efficacité (63.6 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 1% more heat output (11,942 vs 12,010 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$6.42 | Daily net profit | -$2.69 |
| -$6,144 | Net after 1 year | -$4,982 |
| -$8,487 | Net after 2 years | -$5,965 |
| -$10,831 | Net after 3 years | -$6,947 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S++Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S++22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M50S++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S++ is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M50S++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M50S++?
The Whatsminer M50S++ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M50S++?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 41.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (63.6 vs 22.0 J/TH).