MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S is the stronger pick — it leads on 2 of 4 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs 55.0 TH/s at 63.6 J/TH; the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs 12.0 TH/s at 166.7 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3 |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 166.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10.7 kg | Weight | 8.1 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 11/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Based on BTC price of $64,605 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 358% more hashrate (55.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT Whatsminer M3 sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 358% more hashrate (55.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 43% better power draw (3,500 vs 2,000 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 62% better efficacité (63.6 vs 166.7 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 24% better weight (10.7 vs 8.1 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 75% more heat output (11,942 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 38% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 11.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.61 | Daily net profit | -$4.41 |
| -$6,213 | Net after 1 year | -$1,610 |
| -$8,627 | Net after 2 years | -$3,219 |
| -$11,040 | Net after 3 years | -$4,829 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M3Score: 11/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S63.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 is more profitable at $-4.41/day compared to $-6.61/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or MicroBT Whatsminer M3?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs at 166.7 J/TH — a difference of 103.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (63.6 vs 166.7 J/TH).