MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 416.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 5,200 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 17,742 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+
Based on BTC price of $78,194 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 1161% more hashrate (33.0 vs 416.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 1161% more hashrate (33.0 vs 416.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 59% better power draw (2,145 vs 5,200 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 81% better efficacité (65.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 142% more heat output (7,319 vs 17,742 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 15% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | $2.49 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | +$909 |
| -$5,391 | Net after 2 years | +$1,817 |
| -$6,837 | Net after 3 years | +$2,726 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+$6.45/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ is more profitable at $2.49/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 52.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (65.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).