Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Taux de hachage 31.0 TH/s Puissance 1,860 W Efficiency 60.0 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Taux de hachage 416.0 TH/s Puissance 5,200 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer M21 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer M21 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+
31.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 416.0 TH/s
1,860 W Consommation électrique 5,200 W
60.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
7,150.0 kg Weight 18.0 kg
6,346 BTU/hr BTU Output 17,742 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Daily Revenue 0.00001427 BTC $1.10
Daily Electricity -$4.46
Daily Profit -$3.37
Monthly -$101.07
Yearly -$1,229.63

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Daily Revenue 0.00019144 BTC $14.70
Daily Electricity -$12.48
Daily Profit $2.22
Monthly $66.49
Yearly $808.97

Based on BTC price of $76,769 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 1242% more hashrate (31.0 vs 416.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M21 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 1242% more hashrate (31.0 vs 416.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 64% better power draw (1,860 vs 5,200 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 79% better efficacité (60.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 100% better weight (7,150.0 vs 18.0 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 180% more heat output (6,346 vs 17,742 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ 7% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

$5.59/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

MicroBT Whatsminer M21 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ is more profitable at $2.22/day compared to $-3.37/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

MicroBT Whatsminer M21 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+: which fits a residential setup better?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

MicroBT Whatsminer M21 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The MicroBT Whatsminer M21 runs at 60.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 47.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (60.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).